![]() This is a softer aproach then planting negatives. one on the mark and one just on the color you don’t like to include. Remember you can move the selection eyedropper independently from the choosen selection area. Use one to mask you wanted area and the second to counter effect the bleeding on the not desired areas. Some other feature is : contra selection: place two (separate masks) controlines nearly on the same spot. So try both until you can predict which is probably better in the case your working on. Which can be a good thing or a bad thing. When you set a new control point or line without clicking first new mask they are connected! So you can select in ONE mask multiple colors/luminances. If you have still bleeding mask on places you don’t like use ALT (WIN) to activate a negative controlpoint or line. (best selection at 50% selectivity rate (the old controlpoint percentage.))įrom there you fine tune selection with the chroma and luminance selectivity-slider. This means you can target a area and then move the eyedropper around to find a good startingpoint. So the outer ring of effected area is completely centred around the colorselection.Ī controline has a movable eyedropper which you can place anywere you like wile the line to effect a area can be set somewhere else. Let me tell you the main difference between control point and line except the shape of the selection area.Ĭontrol point has a color/luminance selection on a marker in te centre of the circle. → 22:30… pulling the (continuous) control line from the bottom over the brook for maximum effect and sampling the blue reflection from the water, while he just pulled the dashed line some way out, suppose to better correct / follow the brook … then used an additional negative control line to exclude both banksĭifferent to a control point, where you place its center over the area to be influenced, with a control line you sample from any point determined by the picker’s position, giving you more ‘freedom’. But he laid the control line parallel to the water above the brook, roughly the same width. ![]() I would have pulled up the area right above the creek like the gradient tool, following the course of the stream (as you wrote). PhotoJoseph wanted to change the color in the water of a little creek. ![]() → min 18:00 … pulling the (continuous) control line for maximum effect on the blue sky ( sampled by the Picker / the chosen area narrowed down with Chrominance / Luminance sliders) and the smaller lower part (dashed line) as a ‘gradient’ to smooth out the blue over the horizon Optimizing your landscape photography with DxO PhotoLab 5 - YouTube Why did he not pull this “gradient blind” across the complete sky? When he changed the heaven, let’s say 10 cm, he marked a stripe of 2 cm in the lower part of the heaven, but that changed the whole area.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |